The flyover deteriorated to the point former Improvement Trust chairman Dinesh Bassi publicly warned it "may collapse," alleging substandard contractor work and demanding an FIR and high-level inquiry; it was also built without a service lane.
On record
The official record states: "Not specified — no official structural assessment or government response cited."
Filed as "Still standing (barely) — flagged as at risk of collapse" and dated to Built in recent years; safety concerns raised 2025-2026, this entry sits under the "Not specified" line of the public accounts.
What to expect
- Pillars reaching skyward with no deck to justify them.
- A signboard promising an opening date that has since passed, unbothered.
- Traffic queuing patiently beneath the unfinished span.
- Rebar exposed where the road was meant to continue.
Sourcing
1 public source — news reports, RTI replies and civic archives — corroborate this entry. The citation trail is listed below for anyone who would like to follow up with the department concerned.
“The project timeline is drawn in pencil, then respected as ink.”— Blunderlust Editorial Desk
Sources
Visitor reviews
“Came for the view and got a very close look at the traffic. It peaked at the ribbon-cutting and has coasted since.”
“Stopped here to wait out a downpour and stayed by choice. The neighbourhood talks about it the way you talk about weather.”
“Went looking for the entrance for a solid ten minutes. Nobody could tell me when it opens, including the guard.”
